Considering i have an i5 8400 six core and (would) have a 1660ti, this shouldn't draw near enough the 360w, right? Nvidia GTX 1660 Super vs 1660 Ti: 1440p benchmarks. Following the release of its "Super" RTX 2060, 2070 and 2080 GPUs, NVIDIA is back with a pair of updated graphics cards: the GeForce GTX 1660 Super and GTX 1650 Super… JMVC GTX 1650 vs GTX 1660 vs GTX 1660 Ti vs RTX 2060 with a Skylake i7 6700k @4.7GHz frame rate test benchmark comparison. GTX 1660 and GTX 1650 SUPER are GTX 16 series graphics cards that are built on the Turing GPU architecture on the 12nm manufacturing process and use the TU116 GPU chip. Most Phanteks airflow series cases already done! If its a FPS, rhythm game, more serious racing game or literally anything fast paced where timing matters this is how most people set things up, even if its just turning down shadow and lighting detail thats enough to bump frames dramatically. Short of Nvidia's high-end options, we don't usually get three variants of a GPU. if your PSU is rated for 400W, then it can supply 400W of power, the 1660ti is about 220W as you say, your systme core will add about 80 watts ontop of that and let's call it 15 watts extra for some drives. However, I think the GTX 1660 Ti’s additional £30 / $30 or so is probably worth the extra money when you consider each card’s 1440p performance. Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti better than EVGA GeForce GTX 1650 Super SC Ultra Gaming? Likewise if we are going to argue diminishing returns 75hz to 144hz isn't a massive deal, but 60hz really is. 60Hz is the sweetest spot for gaming, although I do prefer 75-85Hz for internet browsing. After a new pair of headphones, need suggestions! Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display. And is it worth making me sleep better at night knowing that I''l have a card that won't potentially break my power supply? yeah nah not one of my power supplies is measured in "peak output". RX 5500 XT vs. GTX 1650 Super: Nvidia Takes the Win, by Inches. Precisely for that reason, we have an EVGA GTX 1660 Super SC … save. Newer versions can support more bandwidth and deliver better performance. For that its great. Designed for high-fidelity 1920x1080 gaming, it’s up to 1.5x faster than a GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, and is significantly faster than older, still-popular GPUs like the GeForce GTX 750 Ti. The graphics card contains two graphics processing units (GPUs). 2Pcs/Lot PLD09210S12HH GPU Card Cooler F... 2Pcs/Lot PLD09210S12HH GPU Card Cooler Fan For MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Super 1660 1660Ti GAMING X Graphics Card Fan $18.00 Get the deal Yeah I completely agree. Short of Nvidia's high-end options, we don't usually get three variants of a GPU. The 1660ti is a £300 card that pulls around a total system power consumption of 280, whereas the GTX 1650 Super is a £160 card that pulls around an average system power consumption of 220. This generally results in better performance than a similar, single-GPU graphics card. The GeForce GTX 1650 Super 4GB requires 100 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB requires 120 Watts. Gtx 1650 Super Vs Gtx 1660 Ti. share. So tell me everything about how awful Nvidia's x50 line-up is! Will the Asus Prime X570-Pro spin up fans w/o a CPU? Started 7 minutes ago There is about a 20-25 average fps difference between both cards. GTX 1650 comes with 896 CUDA Cores and uses TU117 GPU chip, while the GTX 1650 SUPER comes with 1280 CUDA Cores, which is 384 CUDA Cores more than the GTX 1650 and uses the TU116 core, which is the same GPU Chip used in the GTX 1660 and GTX 1660 … Hello gamers, I'm thinking of purchasing a 'budget' gpu for my build and I can't decide whether the Gtx 1650 super for around 190€ or the Gtx 1660 Ti for 250€ is more value. Thats not true at all, i think you are forgetting how much a lot of settings tank frames and how most reviews just run ultra when any slightly more competitive person, even if not a great player, is going to turn things down just because the smoothness of more consistent frame times make the game 10x nicer to play. So basically I should buy the 1660ti but not overclock it or anything due to the relatively small amount of headroom? Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU. The 1660ti is a £300 card that pulls around a total system power consumption of 280, whereas the GTX 1650 Super is a £160 card that pulls around an average system power consumption of 220. There isn't THAT much difference between 60 and 144 FPS, There is a huge difference, play at 60fps on a decent 144hz monitor and it looks like stuttering the entire time, hurts your eyes, this exact issue stopped me from playing Halo Forge. I wouldn't trust that PSU with a 35W Pentium III running solo, let alone a modern gaming PC. This allows it to be overclocked more, increasing performance. Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs. GeForce RTX 2060: Which Mainstream GPU to Buy? Max_4 Started 18 minutes ago Tier E if on sale not the worst but not good. GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER Memory: 4096Mb GDDR6 DESKTOP Release date: 22 Nov 2019. Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort. (Also case airflow matter or if you are using Downcraft air cooler). If he does though even the 1660, or a cheap 5700, maybe 2060 (throw used 1070s and Vega cards in there) is a way better option, its a distinct and obvious upgrade rather then "well this feels less worse", You need to be a member in order to leave a comment. TL;DR - get the 1660Ti, it will run fine, upgrade your PSU later on. I've done all 3, 75hz is more noticable then you'd think and closer to being irrelevantly different from 144hz then 60hz is. Compare CPUs vs. Top Comparisons. The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second. Random-access memory (RAM) is a form of volatile memory used to store working data and machine code currently in use. The GTX 1660 Ti and the GTX 1650 were still a distance away on the Grand Theft Auto V test (Very High, 1080p), averaging 56 fps and 39 fps, respectively (43.59% increase in performance). Drexl Its not that awful but as somebody who tries to push about 144hz at 1080p or ideally little to no dips in frame-rates i found a rx590 is just bearly not good enough. Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti better than EVGA GeForce GTX 1650 Super SC Ultra Gaming? The 1660ti is a £300 card that pulls around a total system power consumption of 280, whereas the GTX 1650 Super is a £160 card that pulls around an average system power consumption of 220. 400watt psu is enough for those, you could get used 1080 or 1070ti around 300bucks and your psu would be enough still, |Ryzen 7 3700x, OC to 4.2ghz @1.3V, 67C, or 4.4ghz @1.456V, 87C || Asus strix 5700 XT, +50 core, +50 memory, +50 power (not a great overclocker) || Asus Strix b550-A || G.skill trident Z Neo rgb 32gb 3600mhz cl16-19-19-19-39, oc to 3733mhz with the same timings || Cooler Master ml360 RGB AIO || Phanteks P500A Digital || Thermaltake ToughPower grand RGB750w 80+gold || Samsung 850 250gb and Adata SX 6000 Lite 500gb || Toshiba 5400rpm 1tb || Asus Rog Theta 7.1 || Asus Rog claymore || Asus Gladius 2 origin gaming mouse || Monitor 1 Asus 1080p 144hz || Monitor 2 AOC 1080p 75hz ||, | Ryzen 5 3400G || Gigabyte b450 S2H || Hyper X fury 2x4gb 2666mhz cl 16 ||Stock cooler || Antec NX100 || Silverstone essential 400w || Transgend SSD 220s 480gb ||, | i3 9100F || Msi Ventus gtx 1050 TI || MSI Z390 A-Pro || Kingston 1x16gb 2400mhz cl17 || Stock cooler || Kolink Horizon RGB || Silverstone essential 400w || Pny CS900 120gb ||. something it didn't use to do a few months ago. stop buying 50 series cards, im not saying this as a foe i came from a 1050ti very recently, get out of the hell hole that is 50 series card, whether its 1050 or 1650, whether that means 1660 or rx590 just get the hell out its terrible, run away while you can, sounds like you very much dislike the 50 series lol, its 160-180$ here and 15-20% behind AMD/Radeon offerings here, so yes i louthe it becuase when i bought my 1050ti i had the option to bought a RX570 (often 120$ now and still superior to most 1650 variants) for same price as far worse 1050ti at the time (over a year ago) because i was a dumbass and bought a 1050ti because of brand loyalty to Nvidea. The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed. Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort. stop buying base level honda civics with hood scoops and GT spoilers, it doesn't make them better sports cars, im tired and a bit tipsy, i don't know what your full paragraph asked but *@#& the 1650, all of them, for that price you could get a rx580-590 for better performance for $, but 1660, go for it, it actually secures a good place in the market if you get it at a good price DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics. Posted in Troubleshooting, By HWBench. i've run a 1080Ti and overclocked 4790k on a 550W psu before where the system power draw was something in the region of 480W - in reality unless you've got some monstrosity of a single GPU that needs three 8-pin connectors and the power supply of a small city to function (see my sig lmao) then you rarely need more than 650W for even the most powerful single GPU setup, even things like the 295x2, radeon pro duo and the titan Z - they're dual-8-pin setups so you could get away with running them on something like a 550-650w psu if you really had to I'd rather get a new card simply because of trust issues and I'm almost certain the ti is better than the super in terms of power consumption and fps, You can try to overclock, if it crashes then it crashes and you restart your system. It's hard to make this call, given that these two cards are so close on performance. The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second. Even the RTX 2060S isn't good enough to push that many frames in modern AAA titles at 1080p. but *@#& the 1650, all of them, for that price you could get a rx580-590 for better performance for $. The reason i'm bothered about the power is because I own a 400w PSU and therefore I'm a little tentative about buying the 1660ti as it recommends a psu of 450w, whereas the 1650 super recommends 350 (fitting nicely to my system). Newer versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher transfer rates that give increased performance. The thermal design power (TDP) is the maximum amount of power the cooling system needs to dissipate. The RTX 2060 is the most straightforward of the three with Nvidia’s Founders Edition acting as a firm baseline. Okay yes, the 1650 Super is great if you are just playing 60-75hz, and 75hz i can respect in particular if not 60hz. Tier D and E avoid. Posted in Graphics Cards, By Well that could be because it's very low end. Earlier this year, Nvidia launched its new GTX 16-series with the GTX 1660 Ti, GTX 1660, and GTX 1650 seeking to join the ranks of the best graphics cards. Tier 6&7 for stock. Neither the GTX 1660 Super nor the 1650 Super will have reference or FE models from Nvidia. They are based on the TU116 core which is being manufactured on 12nm process. Tier A for overclocking 5950x. With a launch price of just $160 the 1650S is aimed squarely at AMD’s 500 series cards. Is that 60€ difference a big one for the performance? (if you use msi afterburner, test your oc and only check the "use these setting when startup" when you sure that your oc is stable), im tired and a bit tipsy, i don't know what your full paragraph asked i read like 60% of it but *@#& the 1650, all of them, for that price you could get a rx580-590 for better performance for $, but 1660, go for it, it actually secures a good place in the market if you get it at a good price R9 3900x 4.25GHz All-Core // X570 Aorus Ultra // 32GB Predator 3200MHz // 3090 FTW3 Ultra // Meshify S2 White/Black (Foam Filter Delete), i7-4790k 4.8GHz // Z97X-UD5H // 32GB Dominator Platinum 2133MHz // 2080Ti Lightning Z // Define R6 (Front Panel Mod/Delete), R5 3600 4.25GHz All-Core // B450i Aorus Pro Wifi // 16GB Predator RGB 3200MHz // Vega64 Silver (Air) // Phanteks Evolv ITX (Front Panel Mod), (Upgrade in consideration: R9 3900x 4.25GHz All-Core // B550i/X570i Aorus Pro Wifi), i7-8750H // Asus FX705GM // 32GB 2400MHz // 1060 6GB, i5-8600K // Asus Prime Z370-M Plus // 16GB Vengeance LPX 3200MHz // 1080Ti FE // Meshify C Mini (Foam Filter Delete). Tier A for Rtx 3000, Vega and RX 6000. Now don't get me wrong, the 1660ti is obviously a better card, but is it worth almost double the price for the performance increase? The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. 86.4 GPixel/s vs 56.16 GPixel/s Meanwhile, the difference between the GPUs remained consistent on the Hitmanbenchmark (Ultra, 1080p), as the GTX 1660 Ti nai… save. The energy consumption of the GeForce GTX 1660 Super amounts to 125 watts and therefore 5 Watt higher than the GTX 1060 or GTX 1660 Ti. It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card. Posted in Troubleshooting, By A lower idle temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better. 30.24 GPixel/s higher pixel rate? I agree but won't he need a bigger power supply then? stop buying 50 series cards, im not saying this as a foe i came from a 1050ti as of very recently, get out of the hell hole that is 50 series card, whether its 1050 or 1650, whether that means 1660 or rx590 just get the hell out its terrible, run away while you can, save yourself, the 1650 Super offers nothing worthwhile regardless of the stupid DDR6 ram upgrade, *&$^ing run away GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce GTX 1660; GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce GTX 1660. Their reference stock GPU clock speeds are pretty similar to each other, the boost clocks are somewhat different, while there’s a significant difference in their stock video memory clock speeds, where the GTX 1660 Super clocks its video memory at 250 MHz more. Tier B for overclocking 5900x, Tier C for overclocking 5800X. The comparison is only natural, then: GTX 1660 Ti vs. 1660 Super vs. 1660. 85 watts short of the power supply's rating - plenty of headroom. It is a quick-access, temporary virtual storage that can be read and changed in any order, thus enabling fast data processing. TL;DR - get the 1660Ti, it will run fine, upgrade your PSU later on, addendum: for £300 you can get a Vega56 which is a faster card, Main - Zenith. the last time i saw a supply saying "peak output" it was back in 2011. every power supply i've bought or worked with has had it's wattage rating based on maximum continuous output, not maximum short-term peak output. Chipsets with a higher number of transistors, semiconductor components of electronic devices, offer more computational power. That’s only $70 off of the price of some RTX 2070s.There are no Founders Editions for the GTX 166… Another thing where GTX 1660 Super again has 50% more of it over the GTX 1650 Super, is the amount of GDDR6 video memory, where it brings 6 instead of 4 GB’s video memory, which for sure helps with gaming at a higher resolution. The energy consumption of the GeForce GTX 1660 Super amounts to 125 watts and therefore 5 Watt higher than the GTX 1060 or GTX 1660 Ti. show full text NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile Comparing the GTX 1650S and the RX 590 shows that the 590 leads by 3% but the 1650S is around 10% cheaper. There isn't THAT much difference between 60 and 144 FPS, but despite that you'll need over 2x stronger hardware to reach that point. Its that simple. ( You can overclock Tier C just fine, but it can get very loud, that is why it is not recommended for overclocking, same with tier D). And really I think there are many options generally that would perform better than these new Nvidia stop gap cards, at similar prices, RYZEN 5 3600 | EVGA GTX 1070 FTW2 | 16GB CORSAIR VENGEANCE LPX 3200 DDR4 | MSI B350M MORTAR | 250GB SAMSUNG EVO 860 | 4TB TOSHIBA X 300 | 1TB TOSHIBA SSHD | 120GB KINGSTON SSD | WINDOWS 10 PRO | INWIN 301| BEQUIET PURE POWER 10 500W 80+ SILVER | ASUS 279H | LOGITECH Z906 | DELL KB216T | LOGITECH M185 | SONY DUALSHOCK 4, LENOVO IDEAPAD 510 | i5 7200U | 8GB DDR4 | NVIDIA GEFORCE 940MX | 1TB WD | WINDOWS 10 GO HOME, 1660 SUPER OR 1660TI. Neither the GTX 1660 Super nor the 1650 Super will have reference or FE models from Nvidia. By Posted in Troubleshooting, By Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super vs Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super. They co… Tier D for overclocking 5600X. It is powered by RDNA GPU architecture and the GPU chip used is the Navi 14. With Nvidea any of the 1660s or a used 1070 is there for you, i just find the 50s, even the 1650 Super right below exactly where one would want if trying to push those frames, even if you turn most settings down to low, as i do, with few exceptions like textures. 0 comments. This isn't completely AMD vs Nvidea though, if you can get any version of a 1660, its going to be superior to anything save 5700 series in said current price bracket, which is because sadly the 5700 is in a completely different price-bracket (wasn't always, but AMD fucked up and stopped selling 290$ 5700s when they could of ate up the entire mid-range market with that) The Radeon R… 84.96 GPixel/s vs 56.16 GPixel/s GTX 1660 Ti uses the full TU116 core and comes with 1536 CUDA Cores, while GTX 1660 and GTX 1660 SUPER use the cut down version of TU116 core with some cores locked, and posses 1408 CUDA Cores only. ... MSI Gaming GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 192-bit HDMI/DP 6GB GDRR6 HDCP Support DirectX 12 Dual Fan VR Ready OC Graphics Card (GTX 1660 TI Gaming X 6G) (Renewed) $499.66: Get the deal: Just for love of god don't buy a 1650, the faster ram doesn't make it a card it physically can't be, the tiny inadequate die size is still the same. The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth. Why is PNY GeForce GTX 1660 Ti XLR8 Gaming OC better than EVGA GeForce GTX 1650 Super SC Ultra Gaming? A small form factor allows more transistors to fit on a chip, therefore increasing its performance. (With a grain of salt, I use tier C for OS myself). The GTX 1660 Ti averaged 43 fps on the Rise of the Tomb Raidertest (Very High, 1080p), leaving the GTX 1650 below our 30 fps playability threshold at 29 fps (48.3% increase in performance). Likewise before i mention monitors, even in the most recent LTT review it was noted how actual FPS, even if it can't be displayed by say a 60hz monitor is a huge deal. Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image. Storage tier List. When in stock it sells for $350, while overclocked cards or those with fancy cooling solutions can cost up to $420. Started 33 minutes ago EVGA GeForce GTX 1650 Super SC Ultra Gaming, Asus TUF GeForce GTX 1650 Super Gaming OC, Asus ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1650 Super Gaming. you have failed the protein check. The Nvidia GTX 1650 Super features 12Gbps GDDR6 up from 8Gbps of GDDR5 on the “not super” GTX 1650. prepare to be folded. However the blurryness of certain 60hz monitors with lower response times you can't see it as a stutter, just blurry, so it atleast doesn't hurt ones eyes. Cpu cooler tier list. Tier B for OS/Games. Started 17 minutes ago Mpire934 A lower TDP typically means that it consumes less power. Its not that awful but as somebody who tries to push about 144hz at 1080p or ideally little to no dips in frame-rates i found a rx590 is just bearly not good enough and 1650 Supers in same performance tier here. 30.96 GPixel/s higher pixel rate ? GTX 1650 vs GTX 1660 vs GTX 1660 Ti Test in 7 Games - YouTube Tier E avoid. ), For everyone else it's just really poor value,  even tho the card objectively may be "ok(ish)". DrDeVoe With a launch price of just $160 the 1650S is aimed squarely at AMD’s 500 series cards. 0 comments. The lack of … Tier 3&4 for overclocking Ryzen 3,5,7 or lower power Intel Cpus. I can respect a argument for lower Hz monitors for value without losing much quality, Acer makes a great sub 100$ 1080p IPS 75hz monitors, in the 19" inch SB220Q and 23" inch SB230, and i'd happily recommend that to anybody working on a budget build, especially if color are important to them, but there is still a big difference if you are doing anything fast paced. Rated peak output is just one side of the story. Posted in Displays, By Is that 60€ difference a big one for the performance? Started Just now SlackAssassin Following the release of its "Super" RTX 2060, 2070 and 2080 GPUs, NVIDIA is back with a pair of updated graphics cards: the GeForce GTX 1660 Super and GTX 1650 Super… I'd admire the power usage and that for the money, unlike the RTX cards, its good value, but just feels like its just just bad enough to leave one wanting, as is the rx590 at this point. GTX 1650 and GTX 1650 SUPER are GeForce 16 series cards from Nvidia that are based on the Turing GPU architecture and are built on the 12nm manufacturing process. More HDMI ports mean that you can simultaneously connect numerous devices, such as video game consoles and set-top boxes. i've run a 1080Ti and overclocked 4790k on a 550W psu before where the system power draw was something in the region of 480W - in reality unless you've got some monstrosity of a single GPU that needs three 8-pin connectors and the power supply of a small city to function (see my sig lmao) then you rarely need more than 650W for even the most powerful single GPU setup, even things like the 295x2, radeon pro duo and the titan Z - they're dual-8-pin setups so you could get away with running them on something like a 550-650w psu if you really had to The Nvidia GTX 1650 Super features 12Gbps GDDR6 up from 8Gbps of GDDR5 on the “not super” GTX 1650. Precisely for that reason, we have an EVGA GTX 1660 Super SC … Gpu tier list. To go back to my original point, which yes i made a bit too enthusiastically, but i went from a 1050ti to a RX590 and it was a improvement but still felt distinctly lacking, like why did i even bother, but again i own a 144hz TN panel, if OP doesn't, and doesn't plan to, then its not a big deal. There is about a 20-25 average fps difference between both cards. My 1050ti is also starting to under perform now and have many lag stutters. It's easy!